Summary
In Woodcliff Lake v. State Board, c., 14 N.J.Mis. R. 132; affirmed, 117 N.J.L. 114, it was held that a value for rate making purposes was not material in fixing the taxable value of a reservoir.
Summary of this case from Hackensack Water Co. v. State Bd. of Tax AppealsOpinion
Argued May 28, 1936 —
Decided October 2, 1936.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 14 N.J. Mis. R. 132.
For the appellant, Donald M. Waesche.
For the respondents, Chandless, Weller Selser.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — LLOYD, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 6.
For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HEHER, PERSKIE, JJ. 3.