Summary
denying preliminary injunction in part because plaintiff's evidence was unnavigable and thus deficient
Summary of this case from Goped Ltd. v. Amazon.Com Inc.Opinion
No. 3:01-CV-00404-LRH (VPC).
August 23, 2006
ORDER
Before this Court is Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Valerie P. Cooke (Doc. #159) entered on May 25, 2006, recommending denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. #128) filed on February 21, 2006. Plaintiffs filed their Objection to Report and Recommendation by U.S. Magistrate Judge (Doc. #170) on June 16, 2006, and Defendants filed their Response to Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on July 13, 2006 (Doc. #185), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 1B 3-2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #159) entered on May 25, 2006, should be adopted and accepted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #159) entered on May 25, 2006, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (#128) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.