From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winkle v. Bannan

U.S.
Nov 6, 1961
368 U.S. 34 (1961)

Summary

In Winkle v. Bannan, 368 U.S. 34, 82 S.Ct. 146,7 L.Ed.2d 91 (1961), the court vacated the judgment and remanded the cause on suggestion of the State "for consideration in light of Mapp v. Ohio." Apparently a collateral attack was there involved, but the opinion of the United States Supreme Court cannot be read to dispose of the issue or to foreshadow the ultimate view.

Summary of this case from State v. Smith

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.

No. 93, Misc.

Decided November 6, 1961.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, Joseph B. Bilitzke, Solicitor General, and Robert Weinbaum, Assistant Solicitor General, for respondent.


The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and, as suggested by the Attorney General of Michigan, the case is remanded for consideration in light of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643.


Summaries of

Winkle v. Bannan

U.S.
Nov 6, 1961
368 U.S. 34 (1961)

In Winkle v. Bannan, 368 U.S. 34, 82 S.Ct. 146,7 L.Ed.2d 91 (1961), the court vacated the judgment and remanded the cause on suggestion of the State "for consideration in light of Mapp v. Ohio." Apparently a collateral attack was there involved, but the opinion of the United States Supreme Court cannot be read to dispose of the issue or to foreshadow the ultimate view.

Summary of this case from State v. Smith
Case details for

Winkle v. Bannan

Case Details

Full title:WINKLE v . BANNAN, WARDEN

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 6, 1961

Citations

368 U.S. 34 (1961)

Citing Cases

Winkle, v. Kropp

The petition for habeas corpus and certiorari which he filed in the Michigan courts was denied. He then…

Winkle v. Kropp

The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari and upon the suggestion of the Attorney General of…