From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wiltew v. Parker

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Oct 30, 2009
CIVIL ACTION 09-518-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Oct. 30, 2009)

Summary

finding that defendant's declaration concerning amount in controversy may properly be considered in remand analysis, where declaration documented the value of three different bids which formed the basis of the plaintiff's claims

Summary of this case from Spottswood v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 09-518-CG-M.

October 30, 2009


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

The court agrees with the defendant that his declaration may be considered in determining whether the court had jurisdiction at the time the case was removed. However, even if the court accepts as true the amounts of the bids in questtion asserted by the defendant, those amounts, while no doubt relevant to determining the ultimate amount of damages, do no help the court to determine by a preponderance of the evidence what the measure of damages will actually be in this case, as the complaint does not specify what types of damages the plaintiff is seeking beyond the generic catagories of "compensatory," "consequential" and "punitive". Accordingly, the information before the court is too speculative to make such a finding.

It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand be GRANTED (Doc. 5) and that this action be REMANDED to the Mobile County Circuit Court for all further proceedings.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wiltew v. Parker

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Oct 30, 2009
CIVIL ACTION 09-518-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Oct. 30, 2009)

finding that defendant's declaration concerning amount in controversy may properly be considered in remand analysis, where declaration documented the value of three different bids which formed the basis of the plaintiff's claims

Summary of this case from Spottswood v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company
Case details for

Wiltew v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:WILTEW, Plaintiff, v. JIMMY PARKER, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 30, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 09-518-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Oct. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

Vascular Ventures, LLC v. Am. Vascular Access, LLC

It is well established that, "[i]n a removal action, the party asserting jurisdiction has the burden of…

Spottswood v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company

Based on this evidence, the Kok panel found that "[t]he district court correctly concluded that [the…