From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Warden, Riverbend Det. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Mar 31, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-cv-0355 (W.D. La. Mar. 31, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-cv-0355

03-31-2014

JAMES DENNIS WILSON v. WARDEN, RIVERBEND DETENTION CENTER


JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY


JUDGMENT

For the reasons assigned in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and having thoroughly reviewed the record, including the written objections filed (Record Document 33), and concurring with the findings of the Magistrate Judge under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings for the U.S. District Courts requires the district court to issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant. The court, after considering the record in this case and the standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. Section 2253, denies a certificate of appealability because the applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana, this the 31st day of March, 2014.

_________________

S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wilson v. Warden, Riverbend Det. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Mar 31, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-cv-0355 (W.D. La. Mar. 31, 2014)
Case details for

Wilson v. Warden, Riverbend Det. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES DENNIS WILSON v. WARDEN, RIVERBEND DETENTION CENTER

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Mar 31, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-cv-0355 (W.D. La. Mar. 31, 2014)

Citing Cases

Sims v. Morris

Evans v. Cockrell, 285 F.3d 370, 377 (5th Cir. 2002). See also Wilson v. Warden, Riverbend Det. Ctr., No.…

Quezada v. Avoyolles Corr. Ctr.

Supposing the Court views the current issue raised in objections as the "substantial equivalent" to the…