From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WILLIAMS v. JABE

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division
Dec 31, 2008
Civil Action No. 7:08cv00061 (W.D. Va. Dec. 31, 2008)

Summary

concluding that plaintiff failed to establish that denial of daily congregate prayer was a substantial burden to his religious practice where it was not "a compulsory aspect of his Muslim faith" but merely "preferred" and where plaintiff could pray individually and attend weekly congregational services

Summary of this case from Brooks v. Warden Frank B. Bishop

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:08cv00061.

December 31, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff Chauncey A. Williams brings this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act ("RLUIPA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc et seq., alleging that the defendants violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments and RLUIPA by not allowing him to participate in congregational prayer following his evening mail on certain dates during Ramadan 2007. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment and the court referred the matter to United States Magistrate Judge Michael F. Urbanski for a Report and Recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge subsequently filed a report, finding that Williams failed to demonstrate that the defendants violated his constitutional or statutory rights. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the court grant defendants' motion for summary judgment, deny plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and dismiss this case. Neither party has filed objections. Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and pertinent portions of the record, the court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety; defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docket No. 29) is GRANTED; plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 42) is DENIED; this case is DISMISSED; and this action is STRICKEN from the active docket of the court.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties.


Summaries of

WILLIAMS v. JABE

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division
Dec 31, 2008
Civil Action No. 7:08cv00061 (W.D. Va. Dec. 31, 2008)

concluding that plaintiff failed to establish that denial of daily congregate prayer was a substantial burden to his religious practice where it was not "a compulsory aspect of his Muslim faith" but merely "preferred" and where plaintiff could pray individually and attend weekly congregational services

Summary of this case from Brooks v. Warden Frank B. Bishop

granting summary judgment to defendants and concluding that denying Muslim prisoners congregational prayer after Ramadan evening meals did not violate plaintiff's right to free exercise

Summary of this case from Saif'Ullah v. Albritton

granting summary judgment to defendants and concluding that denying Muslim prisoners congregational prayer after Ramadan evening meals did not violate plaintiff's right to free exercise

Summary of this case from Saif'Ullah v. Cruzen

granting summary judgment to defendants and concluding that denying Muslim prisoners congregational prayer after Ramadan evening meals did not violate plaintiff's right to free exercise

Summary of this case from Smith v. Cruzen
Case details for

WILLIAMS v. JABE

Case Details

Full title:CHUANCEY A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN M. JABE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division

Date published: Dec 31, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:08cv00061 (W.D. Va. Dec. 31, 2008)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Cruzen

Though there are a handful of out-of-circuit cases that have found total bans of congregational prayers to be…

Saif'Ullah v. Cruzen

Though there are a handful of out-of-circuit cases that have found total bans of congregational prayers to be…