From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 6, 2015
No. 4:14-CV-40-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2015)

Summary

comparing social security applicant's IQ score and OLSAT score

Summary of this case from Hitchcock v. Saul

Opinion

No. 4:14-CV-40-FL

01-06-2015

RUDOLPH WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

Decision by Court.

This action came before the Honorable Louise W. Flanagan, United States District Judge, for consideration of the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings and the memorandum and recommendation entered by the United States Magistrate Judge, to which no objections were filed. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered January 6, 2015, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. This matter is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and recommendation. This Judgment Filed and Entered on January 6, 2015, and Copies To: Vaughn Stephen Clauson (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
Peter A. Heinlein (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
January 6, 2015

JULIE A. RICHARDS, CLERK

/s/ Christa N. Baker

(By) Christa N. Baker, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Williams v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 6, 2015
No. 4:14-CV-40-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2015)

comparing social security applicant's IQ score and OLSAT score

Summary of this case from Hitchcock v. Saul
Case details for

Williams v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:RUDOLPH WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 6, 2015

Citations

No. 4:14-CV-40-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2015)

Citing Cases

Reap v. Berryhill

Recommendation adopted by 2016 WL 3514117 (W.D.N.C. June 27, 2016), remanded, No. 16-1988 (4th Cir. Oct. 18,…

Hitchcock v. Saul

The OLSAT is not an IQ test. See, e.g., Pruitt v. Neal, 788 F.3d 248, 253 (7th Cir. 2015) (explaining the…