Summary
finding that where the ALJ properly rejected a medical source's opinions, the ALJ was under no obligation to include the rejected limitations in the RFC or the hypothetical
Summary of this case from Berry v. SaulOpinion
Case No. 3:13 cv 2106
10-06-2014
Teresa Ann White, Plaintiff v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on July 22, 2014, in the above-entitled action. Under the relevant statute:
Within fourteen (14) days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written objections or further appeal is waived.United States v. Campbell, 261 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b) (1). In this case, the fourteen day period has elapsed with no objections filed on the record.
The failure to file written objections to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); see also United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
Following review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16) in its entirety as the Order of the Court. The Commissioner's decision is affirmed.
So Ordered.
s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick
United States District Judge