From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Oct 6, 2014
Case No. 3:13 cv 2106 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 6, 2014)

Summary

finding that where the ALJ properly rejected a medical source's opinions, the ALJ was under no obligation to include the rejected limitations in the RFC or the hypothetical

Summary of this case from Berry v. Saul

Opinion

Case No. 3:13 cv 2106

10-06-2014

Teresa Ann White, Plaintiff v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on July 22, 2014, in the above-entitled action. Under the relevant statute:

Within fourteen (14) days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written objections or further appeal is waived.
United States v. Campbell, 261 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b) (1). In this case, the fourteen day period has elapsed with no objections filed on the record.

The failure to file written objections to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); see also United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Following review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16) in its entirety as the Order of the Court. The Commissioner's decision is affirmed.

So Ordered.

s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick

United States District Judge


Summaries of

White v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Oct 6, 2014
Case No. 3:13 cv 2106 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 6, 2014)

finding that where the ALJ properly rejected a medical source's opinions, the ALJ was under no obligation to include the rejected limitations in the RFC or the hypothetical

Summary of this case from Berry v. Saul

finding that where the ALJ properly rejected a medical source's opinions, the ALJ was under no obligation to include the rejected limitations in the RFC or the hypothetical

Summary of this case from Martin v. Berryhill
Case details for

White v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Teresa Ann White, Plaintiff v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 6, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:13 cv 2106 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 6, 2014)

Citing Cases

Martin v. Berryhill

Therefore, no error can be gleaned from the ALJ's alleged failure to incorporate limitations that have been…

Berry v. Saul

The ALJ was not. No error can be gleaned from an ALJ's decision not to incorporate limitations into the RFC…