From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Cockrell

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Oct 18, 2001
Civil Action No. 3:00-CV-1951-L (N.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 2001)

Summary

accepting recommendation of Mag. J. setting out procedures for habeas actions under § 2254

Summary of this case from Ndudzi v. Castro

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:00-CV-1951-L

October 18, 2001


ORDER


After making an independent, review of the pleadings, flies and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on September 25, 2001, the court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. The Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are hereby accepted by the court. The court therefore declines to dismiss this action because Respondent failed to address the merits of Petitioner, claims as required by the Magistrate Judge's Order to Show Cause entered May 17, 2001.

Respondent, is hereby directed to address the merits of Petitioner's claims and provide all, pertinent documents relating to such claims by no later than November 7, 2001. Respondent's failure to comply with the Magistrate's May 17, 2001, Order," Show Cause has unnecessarily delayed resolution of this action. Accordingly, sanctions will be imposed if Respondent fails to address the merits of Petition's claims in accordance with this order. It is so ordered.


Summaries of

White v. Cockrell

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Oct 18, 2001
Civil Action No. 3:00-CV-1951-L (N.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 2001)

accepting recommendation of Mag. J. setting out procedures for habeas actions under § 2254

Summary of this case from Ndudzi v. Castro

following Ukawabutu and citing Habeas Corpus Rule 11 for the proposition that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not apply in all respects; the respondent's motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust occasioned delay because necessary records were not available to the court

Summary of this case from Ebert v. Clarke
Case details for

White v. Cockrell

Case Details

Full title:ROY LEE WHITE, ID # 798554, Petitioner, v. JANIE COCKRELL, Director Texas…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas

Date published: Oct 18, 2001

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:00-CV-1951-L (N.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 2001)

Citing Cases

Ndudzi v. Castro

The Habeas Rules provide "practical instruction regarding the appropriate procedures for responding to a…

Ebert v. Clarke

Id., at 608-09 (footnotes omitted). See also Sperow v. Walls, 182 F. Supp. 2d 695, 698-700 (C.D. Ill. 2002)…