dismissing a void corporation's appeal because it is inoperative, has ceased to exist, and has lost any standing to appeal and be heard, even if represented by counsel
Summary of this case from Sensoria, LLC v. KaweskeNo. 69, 1990.
September 19, 1990.
Appeal from the Superior CA 89C-JA-165.
AFFIRMED.
dismissing a void corporation's appeal because it is inoperative, has ceased to exist, and has lost any standing to appeal and be heard, even if represented by counsel
Summary of this case from Sensoria, LLC v. Kaweskestating that, when corporation's charter was revoked under section 510, corporation lost any standing to pursue appeal in court
Summary of this case from Metropolitan Interconnect, Inc. v. Alexander HamiltonFull title:Wharton Management Group, v. Sigma Consultants, Inc
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Sep 19, 1990
Contributory recklessness exists when Staats v. Lawrence, 576 A.2d 663 (Del. Super. 1990), aff'd, 582 A.2d…
Zutrau v. JansingLaPoint v. AmerisourceBergen Corp., 970 A.2d 185, 191 (Del. 2009). Taylor v. Desmond, 1990 WL 18366, at *2…