Summary
In Weber v. State, 411 So.2d 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), where appellant on direct appeal raised the issues of ineffectiveness of counsel and illegal sentence, we affirmed the conviction without prejudice to appellant raising these issues initially in the trial court.
Summary of this case from Weber v. StateOpinion
No. 81-1342.
March 23, 1982.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Marshall H. Ader, Judge.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and William A. Cain, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Steven R. Jacob, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HUBBART, C.J., and BARKDULL and NESBITT, JJ.
The appellant seeks review of an adverse jury verdict and sentence accordingly, after being charged with attempted murder and the use of a firearm in the commission of a felony. He urges two points for reversal: The ineffectiveness of counsel and illegal sentence.
We affirm, without prejudice to the appellant raising these issues initially in the trial court. Combs v. State, 403 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1981); Valero v. State, 393 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Cannon v. State, 384 So.2d 970 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla. 1974).
Affirmed.