From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. Oakes

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 29, 1979
262 S.E.2d 254 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

58447.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 5, 1979.

DECIDED OCTOBER 29, 1979.

Action on employment contract. Cobb State Court. Before Judge Robinson.

Dennis C. O'Brien, for appellants.

James A. Hardigg, for appellee.


This appeal is from an order denying appellants' motion to set aside a default judgment pursuant to Code Ann. § 81A-160 (d). We affirm.

1. Due to appellants' noncompliance with a court order requiring the posting of a supersedeas bond or the dismissal of appellants' appeal upon failure to do so, the clerk did not prepare or forward a record in a timely fashion. Appellee's motion to dismiss this appeal for unreasonable and inexcusable delay in filing a transcript is denied.

The record shows that upon appellants' motion, the dismissal was set aside under the authority of DeFee v. Williams, 114 Ga. App. 571 (2) ( 151 S.E.2d 923), and the appeal reinstated. If appellee desires to challenge the propriety of the court's order allowing this appeal, this complaint should have been made by way of cross appeal and not a motion to dismiss. Compare Bettis v. Leavitt, 236 Ga. 213 (4) ( 223 S.E.2d 88), with Patterson v. Professional Resources, Inc., 242 Ga. 459 (1b) ( 249 S.E.2d 248). See generally Smith v. Smith, 128 Ga. App. 29 (1) ( 195 S.E.2d 269) noting that the late filing of the transcript of evidence and proceedings is no longer grounds for dismissal of appeals by the appellate courts.

2. Appellants submit that the court erred in issuing a default judgment without hearing any evidence thereon. See e.g. Wallis v. McMurray, 91 Ga. App. 549 (4) ( 86 S.E.2d 529). Compare Rogers v. Griggs, 235 Ga. 273 ( 219 S.E.2d 372). With this we cannot agree.

The verified complaint forming the basis for the default judgment averred that "Defendants are indebted to Plaintiff pursuant to an employment agreement for liquidated damages in the amount of $7,029.62." While the legal conclusion that the damages were liquidated was not admitted by default, (see Summerour v. Medlin, 48 Ga. App. 403 (1) ( 172 S.E. 836)), the complaint otherwise sets forth an ex contractu claim seeking a liquidated amount. This being so, and since there is nothing appearing in the pleadings or on the face of the record to indicate the damages were unliquidated, the court properly denied the motion to set aside. Griffin v. First Prof. School of Ga., 149 Ga. App. 22 ( 253 S.E.2d 422). Cf. Loukes v. McCoy, 129 Ga. App. 167 (4) ( 199 S.E.2d 125). Compare Canal Ins. Co. v. Cambron, 240 Ga. 708 ( 242 S.E.2d 32) involving a motion to set aside pursuant to Code Ann. § 81A-160 (e).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, C. J., and Carley, J., concur.


SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 5, 1979 — DECIDED OCTOBER 29, 1979.


Summaries of

Watts v. Oakes

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 29, 1979
262 S.E.2d 254 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Watts v. Oakes

Case Details

Full title:WATTS et al. v. OAKES

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 29, 1979

Citations

262 S.E.2d 254 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
262 S.E.2d 254

Citing Cases

Lord Jeff Knitting Co. v. Boyle

Thus, contrary to appellant's allegations, the face of the complaint and the face of the judgment are in…

Hill Aircraft c. Corp. v. Planes, Inc.

On March 18, 1983, the trial court entered an order granting Hill Aircraft leave to amend and denying Planes,…