From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. Brazelton

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 23, 2013
CV 12-05975 DOC (SS) (C.D. Cal. May. 23, 2013)

Opinion


ANTONIO WATTS, Petitioner, v. P.D. BRAZELTON, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 12-05975 DOC (SS) United States District Court, C.D. California. May 23, 2013

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Amended Report and Recommendation. The time for filing Objections to the Amended Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Petitioner at his current address of record and on counsel for Respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Watts v. Brazelton

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 23, 2013
CV 12-05975 DOC (SS) (C.D. Cal. May. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Watts v. Brazelton

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO WATTS, Petitioner, v. P.D. BRAZELTON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: May 23, 2013

Citations

CV 12-05975 DOC (SS) (C.D. Cal. May. 23, 2013)

Citing Cases

Herrera v. Biter

"The Supreme Court has not clearly established that the admission of out-of-court statements relied on by an…

Herrera v. Biter

"The Supreme Court has not clearly established that the admission of out-of-court statements relied on by an…