stating that unlawful restraint is an essential element of false imprisonment and false arrest claims
Summary of this case from Anderson v. City of New BritainNo. 96-1960.
October 6, 1997, OCTOBER TERM, 1997.
C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 103 F. 3d 1571.
stating that unlawful restraint is an essential element of false imprisonment and false arrest claims
Summary of this case from Anderson v. City of New BritainFull title:WANG LABORATORIES, INC. v. MITSUBISHI ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 6, 1997
We hold the phrase "no employee" must be interpreted to mean "no employee" — whether or not the employee is…
Whiting v. U.S.Whiting, 29 F.Supp.2d at 31. Whiting's explanation for his three-year delay is unconvincing, Whiting, 29…