Summary
holding the 90-day loss of store, telephone, and visitation privileges did not result in the deprivation of a liberty interest or violate the Eighth Amendment
Summary of this case from Marcum v. GaddisOpinion
Case No. 2:06-cv-00896-WKW WO.
November 15, 2006
ORDER
On October 13, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 4) in this case. No objections were filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 4) is ADOPTED; and
2. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.