From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wagner v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 2000
271 A.D.2d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted February 23, 2000.

April 3, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro , J.), dated April 9, 1999, which granted that branch of the motion of the defendant City of New York which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Robert A. Hyman, P.C., Pleasantville, N.Y. (Jason Platt of counsel), for appellant.

Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Pamela Seider Dolgow and John Hogrogian of counsel), for respondent.

DANIEL W. JOY, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, that branch of the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the City of New York.

CPLR 3212(a), as amended effective January 1, 1997, requires a motion for summary judgment to be made within 120 days after the filing of the note of issue, except with leave of court on good cause shown (see, CPLR 3212[a], as amended by L 1996, ch 492). Here, the motion was made well after the 120-day period , without any showing of good cause for the delay. Thus, the motion should have been denied (see, Morhart v. City of New York, 267 A.D.2d 438 [2d Dept., Dec. 27, 1999]; Anzalone v. Varis, 254 A.D.2d 381 ).


Summaries of

Wagner v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 2000
271 A.D.2d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Wagner v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:CLIFFORD WAGNER, appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, respondent , et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
706 N.Y.S.2d 128

Citing Cases

Hilton v. City of New Rochelle

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in entertaining the defendant's oral application…

Dunham v. City of New York

Here, the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment 16 months after the deadline, and without any…