From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anzalone v. Varis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 19, 1998
254 A.D.2d 381 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 19, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

CPLR 3212 (a), as amended effective January 1, 1997, requires a motion for summary judgment to be made within 120 days after the filing of the note of issue, except with leave of court on good cause shown ( see, CPLR 3212 [a], as amended by L 1996, ch. 492). The plaintiffs filed their note of issue in December 1996. The defendants' motion for summary judgment, which was made in November 1997, was properly denied as untimely, as the motion was made more than 120 days after the effective date of the amendment to CPLR 3212 (a) and without a showing of good cause for the delay ( see, Krug v. Jones, 252 A.D.2d 572; Borelli v. Gegaj, 248 A.D.2d 299; Phoenix Garden Rest. v. Chu, 245 A.D.2d 164; Auger v. State of New York, 236 A.D.2d 177, 179-180).

Mangano, P. J., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Anzalone v. Varis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 19, 1998
254 A.D.2d 381 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Anzalone v. Varis

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ANZALONE, Respondent, v. SOPHIA VARIS et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 19, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 381 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 736

Citing Cases

Wagner v. City of New York

Here, the motion was made well after the 120-day period , without any showing of good cause for the delay.…

Scocozza v. Tolia

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The Supreme Court improvidently…