From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wabash Chemical Corp. v. Scholle Chemical Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division
Jan 25, 1966
67 Ill. App. 2d 222 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)

Summary

In Wabash, the agreement provided that if the parties failed to agree on the price, only the seller was excused from its obligations under the contract; the seller could reestablish the contract for the last agreed-upon price by sending notice to the buyer.

Summary of this case from Wagner Excello Foods v. Fearn Int'l, Inc.

Opinion

Gen. No. 50,288. (Abstract of Decision.)

January 25, 1966.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County, County Department, Law Division; the Hon. BENJAMIN SCHWARTZ, Judge, presiding.

Judgment affirmed.

Tenney, Bentley, Guthrie Howell and Jerome S. Wald, of Chicago, for appellant.

Samuel W. Block, Howard R. Barron and Thomas C. Hynes, of Chicago (Raymond, Mayer, Jenner Block, of counsel), for appellee.


Not to be published in full.


Summaries of

Wabash Chemical Corp. v. Scholle Chemical Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division
Jan 25, 1966
67 Ill. App. 2d 222 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)

In Wabash, the agreement provided that if the parties failed to agree on the price, only the seller was excused from its obligations under the contract; the seller could reestablish the contract for the last agreed-upon price by sending notice to the buyer.

Summary of this case from Wagner Excello Foods v. Fearn Int'l, Inc.
Case details for

Wabash Chemical Corp. v. Scholle Chemical Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Wabash Chemical Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scholle Chemical…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division

Date published: Jan 25, 1966

Citations

67 Ill. App. 2d 222 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)
214 N.E.2d 596

Citing Cases

Wagner Excello Foods v. Fearn Int'l, Inc.

The judge held that a jury must decide that fact question. • 4 The defendant also maintains that the contract…