From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wa-Wa-Yanda, Inc. v. Town of Islip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 1966
25 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Summary

In Wa-Wa-Yanda, Inc. v Town of Islip (25 A.D.2d 762, affd 21 N.Y.2d 1013), the Second Department stated "The timely filing of the notice of claim and commencement of the action are conditions precedent to the maintenance of the action."

Summary of this case from Montauk-Caribbean v. Hope

Opinion

April 4, 1966


In an action to recover damages for breach of covenants in a lease, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 24, 1965, which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and directed an assessment of damages. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements; motion denied; and summary judgment granted to defendant. Subdivision 3 of section 65 Town of the Town Law requires that a notice of claim be filed with the Town Clerk within 6 months after a cause of action arising out of contract has accrued, and that the action must be brought within 18 months after such accrual. The cause of action alleged in the complaint accrued upon the refusal by the Building Inspector on February 6, 1961 to grant a permit to construct and install gasoline tanks, pumps and related equipment under the lease between the parties ( Municipal Serv. Co. v. Town of Colonie, 12 A.D.2d 22, 24). The 6-month period for filing the notice of claim accordingly ended on August 6, 1961, and the 18-month period for commencing the action ended on August 6, 1962. The complaint states that the notice of claim was not filed until February 18, 1964, and the action was not commenced until September 22, 1964. The timely filing of the notice of claim and commencement of the action are conditions precedent to the maintenance of the action. Hence, it is clear that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment should have been denied and that the complaint should have been dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3212 (subd. [b]). Christ, Acting P.J., Brennan, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Hill, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order.


Summaries of

Wa-Wa-Yanda, Inc. v. Town of Islip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 1966
25 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

In Wa-Wa-Yanda, Inc. v Town of Islip (25 A.D.2d 762, affd 21 N.Y.2d 1013), the Second Department stated "The timely filing of the notice of claim and commencement of the action are conditions precedent to the maintenance of the action."

Summary of this case from Montauk-Caribbean v. Hope
Case details for

Wa-Wa-Yanda, Inc. v. Town of Islip

Case Details

Full title:WA-WA-YANDA, INC., Respondent, v. TOWN OF ISLIP, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 4, 1966

Citations

25 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Town of Saugerties v. Emp. Ins., Wausau

The defendants did not allege in their answer or counterclaims that they timely filed a notice of claim with…

Montauk-Caribbean v. Hope

In Wa-Wa-Yanda, Inc. v Town of Islip ( 25 A.D.2d 762, affd 21 N.Y.2d 1013), the Second Department stated…