Summary
In Vyas v. Vyas, No. 15-02152, 2017 WL 4621539, at *6 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2017), aff'd 765 Fed.Appx. 195 (9th Cir. 2019), the plaintiff retained Pingree, who, testifying as an expert, concluded that the defendant, Schwab Retirement Plan Services, Inc., was a fiduciary and that it breached its duties to the plaintiff by implementing a freeze on her 401(k) Plan account and improperly allocating the funds in a Keogh Plan account.
Summary of this case from Romano v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co. (U.S.)Opinion
CV 15-02152 RSWL (DFMx
10-13-2017
DR. SUJATA VYAS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. BHASKAR VYAS, an individual; NANCY BUNN, an individual; LOCKHEED MARTIN PENSION PLAN AND CHAMBERS QDRO CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC; CHARLES SCHWAB AND SCHWAB RETIREMENT PLAN SERVICES COMPANY AS PLAN ADMINISTRATOR; COMMITTEE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP (SCPMG) PLAN ADMINISTRATOR; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants.
JUDGMENT
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants Bhaskar Vyas and Schwab Retirement Plan Services, Inc. (erroneously sued as "Charles Schwab and Schwab Retirement Plan Services Company as Plan Administrator") and against Plaintiff Dr. Sujata Vyas ("Plaintiff").
As no Defendants remain, the case is dismissed and the Clerk shall close this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 13, 2017
s/ RONALD S.W.LEW
HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW
Senior U.S. District Judge