From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vose v. Vose

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 17, 1939
280 N.Y. 779 (N.Y. 1939)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Vose v. Vose (280 N.Y. 779) the plaintiff in a prior action was allowed to repudiate the judgment of divorce which he had obtained.

Summary of this case from Krause v. Krause
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

Argued April 18, 1939

Decided May 17, 1939

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Henry A. Uterhart and Alfred M. Schaffer for appellant.

William Gresser, Nathan Walker and T. Channon Press for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ. Taking no part: O'BRIEN, J.

Summaries of

Vose v. Vose

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 17, 1939
280 N.Y. 779 (N.Y. 1939)

In Vose v. Vose (280 N.Y. 779) the plaintiff in a prior action was allowed to repudiate the judgment of divorce which he had obtained.

Summary of this case from Krause v. Krause

In Vose v. Vose (280 N.Y. 779) neither of the parties ever had left this State but obtained a Mexican judgment of divorce by means of correspondence through the mails.

Summary of this case from Martens v. Martens
Case details for

Vose v. Vose

Case Details

Full title:RITA V. VOSE, Respondent, v. CHARLES R. VOSE, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 17, 1939

Citations

280 N.Y. 779 (N.Y. 1939)
21 N.E.2d 616

Citing Cases

Matter of Rathscheck

Neither party went to Mexico at any time, but both joined by mail in the arrangements for the Mexican…

Senor v. Senor

Krause v. Krause ( 282 N.Y. 355) held that a party who had procured a Nevada divorce, void because he at all…

41 Citing Cases