From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

VEDDER v. COX

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Nassau County
Feb 15, 2008
18 Misc. 3d 1142 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Vedder v. Cox, 18 Misc.3d 1142(A), 2008 WL 595857 (N.Y.Sup.2008), the Court found that the only basis for plaintiff's claim against defendants Enterprise Rent–a–Car, ELRAC and ELCO was Vehicle and Traffic Law section 388, which it ruled was preempted by the Graves Amendment, and that there was no proof that defendant Bryan Cox's license or privilege to drive was suspended or revoked.

Summary of this case from Calhoun v. Allen
See 1 Summary

Opinion

February 15, 2008.

Brandveen, J.

Motor Vehicles Imputing Driver's Negligence to Owner. Vehicle and Traffic Law — § 388 (Negligence in use or operation of vehicle attributable to owner).

Summaries of

VEDDER v. COX

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Nassau County
Feb 15, 2008
18 Misc. 3d 1142 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)

In Vedder v. Cox, 18 Misc.3d 1142(A), 2008 WL 595857 (N.Y.Sup.2008), the Court found that the only basis for plaintiff's claim against defendants Enterprise Rent–a–Car, ELRAC and ELCO was Vehicle and Traffic Law section 388, which it ruled was preempted by the Graves Amendment, and that there was no proof that defendant Bryan Cox's license or privilege to drive was suspended or revoked.

Summary of this case from Calhoun v. Allen
Case details for

VEDDER v. COX

Case Details

Full title:Vedder v. Cox

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Nassau County

Date published: Feb 15, 2008

Citations

18 Misc. 3d 1142 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 50408
859 N.Y.S.2d 900

Citing Cases

Moreau v. Josaphat

does not survive the Graves Amendment" and made no showing that, as a matter of fact, [they] properly…

Moreau v. Josaphat

and made no showing that, “as a matter of fact, [they] properly maintained the subject vehicle[s]” (Luma v.…

7 Citing Cases