From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vazquez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 5, 2010
CIVIL ACTION No. 09-2609 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 5, 2010)

Summary

interpreting Section 344 and holding that, when the danger that caused plaintiff's harm is traceable to acts of the possessor of land or his agents, the plaintiff does not need to prove that the possessor had notice of such danger

Summary of this case from Joseph v. Speedy Gas

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 09-2609.

August 5, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 5th day of August, 2010, for the reasons stated in the accompanying opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 20) be DENIED.


Summaries of

Vazquez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 5, 2010
CIVIL ACTION No. 09-2609 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 5, 2010)

interpreting Section 344 and holding that, when the danger that caused plaintiff's harm is traceable to acts of the possessor of land or his agents, the plaintiff does not need to prove that the possessor had notice of such danger

Summary of this case from Joseph v. Speedy Gas
Case details for

Vazquez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PAULA VAZQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 5, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 09-2609 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 5, 2010)

Citing Cases

M.S. v. Cedar Bridge Military Acad.

To establish liability under § 344, a plaintiff must satisfy three elements: “(1) that plaintiff was injured…

Joseph v. Speedy Gas

More precisely, courts interpreting the Restatement (Second) of Torts have long-agreed that where the…