From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vasquez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 20, 1994
210 A.D.2d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Summary

In Vasquez, the First Department was looking for admissible evidence establishing that the defendant was not responsible for the subject bus shelter.

Summary of this case from Stein v. Leon D. Dematteis Constr. Corp.

Opinion

December 20, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Salvador Collazo, J.).


Plaintiff was injured when the bus shelter she was standing under collapsed upon her. Defendants-appellants' sole factual support for their motion was a one-page affidavit from a person employed by only one of them as a civil engineer, who offered only a conclusory denial of responsibility for the subject bus shelter, an insufficient basis for summary judgment (see, Keys v Arnold's Meat Food Prods., 155 A.D.2d 355). For that reason, the initial burden on the summary judgment motion was not sustained, and denial was proper without regard to the sufficiency of the opposing papers (Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324).

We have considered defendants-appellants' remaining arguments, and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Ross, Rubin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Vasquez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 20, 1994
210 A.D.2d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

In Vasquez, the First Department was looking for admissible evidence establishing that the defendant was not responsible for the subject bus shelter.

Summary of this case from Stein v. Leon D. Dematteis Constr. Corp.
Case details for

Vasquez v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MIGDALIA VASQUEZ, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
621 N.Y.S.2d 8

Citing Cases

Vanhanehan v. St. Thomas

This standard requires that the proponent of the motion tender sufficient evidence to eliminate any material…

Stein v. Leon D. Dematteis Constr. Corp.

Instead of providing proof of coverage — as is typical when defending against a claim of breach for failure…