From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Nortrick v. Harried

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Jun 1, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-cv-2790 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jun. 1, 2016)

Summary

dismissing claim against court-appointed counsel based on allegation she violated attorney-client privilege, the court held: “Plaintiff is a member of the Louisiana Bar, subject to the disciplinary rules established by the Supreme Court. Under Louisiana law, complaints against attorneys must be filed with the Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board, the agency established by the Louisiana Supreme Court ‘... to administer the lawyer discipline and disability system.' See Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 2; see also § 11 which authorizes disciplinary counsel to screen and investigate complaints of attorney misconduct. Ultimately, the decision to disbar, suspend, admonish, or otherwise sanction a member of the Louisiana Bar is committed to the authority of the Louisiana Supreme Court. See Rule XIX, § 10.”

Summary of this case from Cooper v. Wilson

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-cv-2790 SECTION P

06-01-2016

ROY ARLEN VAN NORTRICK v. MARY LEE HARRIED


JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed previously herein, noting the absence objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED THAT plaintiff's civil rights complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failing to state a claim for which relief may be granted in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915 and 1915A;

The Clerk of Court is instructed to send a copy of this Order/Judgment to the keeper of the Three Strikes List in Tyler, Texas.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Shreveport, Louisiana, on this 1st day of June, 2016.

/s/ _________

S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Van Nortrick v. Harried

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Jun 1, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-cv-2790 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jun. 1, 2016)

dismissing claim against court-appointed counsel based on allegation she violated attorney-client privilege, the court held: “Plaintiff is a member of the Louisiana Bar, subject to the disciplinary rules established by the Supreme Court. Under Louisiana law, complaints against attorneys must be filed with the Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board, the agency established by the Louisiana Supreme Court ‘... to administer the lawyer discipline and disability system.' See Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 2; see also § 11 which authorizes disciplinary counsel to screen and investigate complaints of attorney misconduct. Ultimately, the decision to disbar, suspend, admonish, or otherwise sanction a member of the Louisiana Bar is committed to the authority of the Louisiana Supreme Court. See Rule XIX, § 10.”

Summary of this case from Cooper v. Wilson
Case details for

Van Nortrick v. Harried

Case Details

Full title:ROY ARLEN VAN NORTRICK v. MARY LEE HARRIED

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Jun 1, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-cv-2790 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jun. 1, 2016)

Citing Cases

Cooper v. Wilson

Cooper is cautioned that communications between clients and their legal counsel that are otherwise protected…