From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valley Natl. Bank v. Spitzer

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Kings County
May 26, 2011
31 Misc. 3d 1232 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Valley Natl. Bank, 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 50926[U], *4, 2011 WL 2084184) this Court declined to stay the New York action against a guarantor in deference to the mortgage foreclosure action against the borrower in Pennsylvania because the borrower had filed for bankruptcy and the foreclosure action was therefore stayed, in prejudice to the plaintiff lender.

Summary of this case from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Pena
See 1 Summary

Opinion

May 26, 2011.

Demarest, J.

Pleading — Amendment — Merit of Amendment. Motions and Orders — Vacatur of Order.

Summaries of

Valley Natl. Bank v. Spitzer

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Kings County
May 26, 2011
31 Misc. 3d 1232 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011)

In Valley Natl. Bank, 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 50926[U], *4, 2011 WL 2084184) this Court declined to stay the New York action against a guarantor in deference to the mortgage foreclosure action against the borrower in Pennsylvania because the borrower had filed for bankruptcy and the foreclosure action was therefore stayed, in prejudice to the plaintiff lender.

Summary of this case from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Pena
Case details for

Valley Natl. Bank v. Spitzer

Case Details

Full title:Valley Natl. Bank v. Spitzer

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Kings County

Date published: May 26, 2011

Citations

31 Misc. 3d 1232 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 50926

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Pena

It has been held, however, that "[a]lthough RPAPL 1301(3) prohibits a mortgage lender seeking repayment of a…

Provident Bank v. Shah

However, "[a]lthough RPAPL §1301(3) prohibits a mortgage lender seeking repayment of a loan from…

4 Citing Cases