Summary
affirming final judgment voiding insured's insurance policy where insurance policy contained a valid provision voiding the policy upon intentional concealment or misrepresentation by the insured
Summary of this case from Alvarez v. State Farm Fla. Ins. Co.Opinion
No. 3D99-2353
Opinion filed July 26, 2000. JULY TERM, A.D. 2000
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Juan Ramirez, Jr., Judge, L.T. No. 97-4109.
Michael I. Libman, for appellant.
Buckner Shifrin; Lauri Waldman Ross, for appellees.
Before JORGENSON and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
Valdez appeals a final judgment voiding his insurance policy. For the following reasons, we affirm.
The insurance policy contained a valid provision voiding the policy upon intentional concealment or misrepresentation by the insured. See Wong Ken v. State Farm Fire Casualty Co., 685 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (clause which voids coverage for intentional misrepresentation is valid and enforceable). The jury found that Valdez violated that provision. Therefore, the trial court properly voided the insurance policy.
AFFIRMED.