From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Taylor

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Sep 27, 2001
No. 3:97-CR-254-P (01), No. 3:00-CV-2495-P (N.D. Tex. Sep. 27, 2001)

Summary

holding that funds withdrawn from the defendant's bank account as cash and a certified check did not constitute "other income" under section 6334

Summary of this case from United States v. Clark

Opinion

No. 3:97-CR-254-P (01), No. 3:00-CV-2495-P

September 27, 2001


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Taylor

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Sep 27, 2001
No. 3:97-CR-254-P (01), No. 3:00-CV-2495-P (N.D. Tex. Sep. 27, 2001)

holding that funds withdrawn from the defendant's bank account as cash and a certified check did not constitute "other income" under section 6334

Summary of this case from United States v. Clark
Case details for

U.S. v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES E. TAYLOR

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas

Date published: Sep 27, 2001

Citations

No. 3:97-CR-254-P (01), No. 3:00-CV-2495-P (N.D. Tex. Sep. 27, 2001)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Kemp

Such an order is necessary to establish the child support exemption. See United States v. Taylor, 2001 WL…

United States v. Clark

The Woods court held that "other income" must instead be limited to "items received by individuals for…