From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Nix

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Dec 30, 2010
628 F.3d 1341 (11th Cir. 2010)

Summary

holding that a conviction under Florida Statute section 843.01, which provides that anyone who "knowingly and willfully resists, obstructs, or opposes any officer . . . in the lawful execution of any legal duty, by offering or doing violence to the person of such officer . . . , is guilty of a felony," is a "violent felony" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(B)

Summary of this case from United States v. Dixon

Opinion

No. 09-15335 Non-Argument Calendar.

December 30, 2010.

Robert E. Adler, Kathleen M. Williams, Fed. Pub. Defenders, West Palm Beach, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Laura Thomas Rivero, Anne R. Schultz, Kathleen M. Salyer, Harriett R. Galvin, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 09-80015-CR-DMM); Donald M. Middlebrooks, Judge.

Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.


Anthony Nix pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and the district court sentenced him as an armed career criminal to prison for 180 months, the minimum sentence permitted by statute, the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). He now appeals his sentence, arguing that two of the three convictions the district court used to qualify him an armed career offender do not qualify as violent felonies under the § 924(e): (1) resisting an arresting officer with violence, in violation of Fla. Stat. § 843.01, and (2) fleeing and eluding at high speed, in violation of Fla. Stat. § 316.1935(3).

The sentencing range prescribed by the Sentencing Guidelines was 168-210 months' imprisonment.

We reject Nix's challenge to the § 843.01 conviction, holding that a such conviction constitutes a violent felony under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). This is the same holding we recently reached in United States v. Hayes, 2010 WL 3489973 (September 8, 2010). Although the Hayes decision was not published, we are persuaded by its rationale regarding § 843.01 and therefore adopt its holding. Nix's challenge to the § 316.1935(3) conviction is foreclosed by United States v. Harris, 586 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2009), which we are bound to follow.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Nix

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Dec 30, 2010
628 F.3d 1341 (11th Cir. 2010)

holding that a conviction under Florida Statute section 843.01, which provides that anyone who "knowingly and willfully resists, obstructs, or opposes any officer . . . in the lawful execution of any legal duty, by offering or doing violence to the person of such officer . . . , is guilty of a felony," is a "violent felony" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(B)

Summary of this case from United States v. Dixon

holding that resisting an officer with violence, in violation of Fla. Stat. § 843.01, and fleeing and eluding at high speed, in violation of Fla. Stat. § 316.1935 are violent felonies under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA)

Summary of this case from United States v. Sanders

holding that a conviction under section 843.01 constituted a "violent felony" under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Baptiste

holding that a conviction for resisting an officer with violence is a violent felony and appropriate to use in determining a person's status as a career offender

Summary of this case from Tarver v. U.S.

Resisting an officer with violence under Florida law is a violent felony under the ACCA's residual clause.

Summary of this case from United States v. Hill

In United States v. Nix, 628 F.3d 1341 (11th Cir. 2010), petition for cert. filed (U.S. June 23, 2011) (No. 11-5011), this Court held that a conviction under Fla. Stat. § 843.01, resisting an officer with violence, qualified as a "violent felony" under the "residual clause" of the Armed Career Criminal Act ("ACCA"), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B).

Summary of this case from United States v. Rolon

In United States v. Nix, 628 F.3d 1341, 1342 (11th Cir. 2010), we held that resisting an officer with violence is a violent felony under the residual clause.

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Jackson

In United States v. Nix, 628 F.3d 1341 (11th Cir. 2010), this Court held that a conviction under Fla. Stat. § 843.01 was a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii).

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Canty
Case details for

United States v. Nix

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony NIX…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Dec 30, 2010

Citations

628 F.3d 1341 (11th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

United States v. Rolon

We review de novo whether a prior conviction qualifies as a "crime of violence" under the sentencing…

Jefferson v. United States

(Id. at 20-25). Before the sentencing hearing resumed, the Eleventh Circuit decided in United States v. Nix,…