From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Jones

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 5, 1999
172 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 1999)

Summary

remanding case to district court for resentencing without an enhancement for serious bodily injury because Supreme Court held that serious bodily injury is an element of the offense rather than a sentencing factor

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Tran

Opinion

No. 96-10179

Decided April 5, 1999

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. D.C. No. CR-92-05264-REC.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, CANBY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The judgment of the district court is reversed in accordance with the Supreme Court's opinion in Jones v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, ___ S.Ct. ___,___ L.Ed.2d ___, 1999 WL 155688 (March 24, 2999), and the matter is remanded to the district court for resentencing.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Jones

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 5, 1999
172 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 1999)

remanding case to district court for resentencing without an enhancement for serious bodily injury because Supreme Court held that serious bodily injury is an element of the offense rather than a sentencing factor

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Tran
Case details for

U.S. v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NATHANIEL JONES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 5, 1999

Citations

172 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 1999)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Tran

We therefore vacate their sentences and remand for resentencing based on their convictions for the simple…

U.S. v. Henderson

Nonetheless, failure to allege the specific drug amount in the indictment is not fatal and does not require…