distinguishing between delay caused by government's "want of diligence" and delay "resulting from the exercise by the government of some right reserved to itself [in contract]"
Summary of this case from Massman Const. Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthNo. 466.
March 10, 1952.
Court of Claims. Certiorari denied. Solicitor General Perlman for the United States. Joseph J. Cotter and Arthur J. Phelan for respondent. Reported below: 119 Ct. Cl. 504, 96 F. Supp. 923.
distinguishing between delay caused by government's "want of diligence" and delay "resulting from the exercise by the government of some right reserved to itself [in contract]"
Summary of this case from Massman Const. Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthFull title:UNITED STATES v. GREAT LAKES DREDGE DOCK CO
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 10, 1952
Exercise of the summary contempt power need not be immediate. See Pennsylvania v. Local 542, 552 F.2d 498,…
Brown v. AllenThis Court granted certiorari. 342 U.S. 953. The case was argued at the October 1951 Term, but was restored…