From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Freedman

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 10, 2009
Case No. 5:08CR335 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 10, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 5:08CR335.

November 10, 2009


ORDER


The United States moves for the Court to issue an Order authorizing the government to provide notice by publication or news release to the large number of potential crime victims in this case in satisfaction of its obligations under the "Justice for All Act." 18 U.S.C. § 3771. Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code § 3771(a), crime victims in federal cases have specific rights, including the right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of public court proceedings. 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(2).

In this case, the potential victims of the charged mail fraud scheme are the individuals who sent fees to the defendant which were deposited to bank accounts controlled by the defendant. These numerous individuals have not yet been fully identified and located. The United States estimates that approximately 19,000 individuals sent in application fees during the charged time period of March 1, 1999, through August, 2008. It would, therefore, be impracticable for the government to identify and locate all of the victims and provide them with a reasonable, accurate and timely notice, as well as the other prescribed rights, without unduly prolonging the proceedings.

The Court finds that the number of crime victims in this case makes it impracticable to accord all the crime victims the rights described in Title 18, United States Code, § 3771(a).

Under these circumstances, 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(2) gives the Court the authority to "fashion a reasonable procedure to give effect to this chapter that does not unduly complicate or prolong the proceedings." The government seeks authorization to provide notice to the potential victims by publication or news release by placing an ad in three weekly national publications which had been used by the defendant in the course of his scheme. These publications are the Sun, the Globe, the National Examiner and the National Enquirer and are identified as being representative of the market from which a large victim population was contacted in this case. The text of the proposed notice is contained in the United States' motion.

The Court adopts the proposal of notification suggested by the government including its addition of the publication the National Enquirer mentioned by the government at the hearing on November 10, 2009. The Court finds that notice by publication or news release as outlined by the government in its motion is a "reasonable procedure" that would give effect to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3771 without unduly complicating or prolonging the proceedings.

Accordingly, the United States is authorized to provide notice to the potential victims in this case by the issuance of a publication or general news release, as outlined in its motion, and by doing so, satisfy the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3771.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Freedman

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 10, 2009
Case No. 5:08CR335 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 10, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Freedman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOEL A. FREEDMAN, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Nov 10, 2009

Citations

Case No. 5:08CR335 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 10, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Aksoy

en-year period - the Government's motion for alternative victim notification via a website after defendant…