From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

USAA Gen. Indem. Co. v. Lytle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 23, 2018
CAUSE NO. 1:17CV361-LG-RHW (S.D. Miss. Apr. 23, 2018)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 1:17CV361-LG-RHW

04-23-2018

USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY PLAINTIFF v. JONATHAN LYTLE; USA MEDICAL CENTER; MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AT GULFPORT; REV CLAIMS, LLC; MED TRANS CORPORATION; O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC.; ALLEGIANCE BENEFIT PLAN MANAGEMENT, INC.; and JOHN DOES 1-20 DEFENDANTS


ORDER REQUIRING ADDITIONAL BRIEFS CONCERNING USA MEDICAL CENTER'S SPECIAL LIMITED APPEARANCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBJECTING TO JURISDICTION

BEFORE THE COURT is the [6] Special Limited Appearance for the Purpose of Objecting to Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, to Dismiss or Transfer for Forum Non Conveniens filed by the defendant USA Medical Center. The defendants Jonathan Lytle and O'Reilly Automotive, Inc., have filed a response in opposition that was joined by the plaintiff USAA General Indemnity Company. However, USA Medical Center did not file a reply in support of its Motion.

After reviewing the submissions of the parties, the record in this matter, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the parties should be required to submit additional briefs that further address Fifth Circuit law concerning this issue, including E-Systems, Inc. v. Pogue, 929 F.2d 1100 (5th Cir. 1991), and Fontenot v. McCraw, 777 F.3d 741, 755 (5th Cir. 2015). The parties must also address whether Congress has authority to abrogate state sovereign immunity under the Commerce Clause. See Hattem v. Schwarzenegger, No. 04 Civ.1944(GEL), 2004 WL 1192355, at *1 n.2 (S.D.N.Y. May 27, 2004) (citing Seminole Tribe v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 65-66 (1996)). Finally, the parties must brief whether waiver or estoppel would prevent USA Medical Center from seeking to recover the funds at issue in this interpleader action if USA Medical Center is dismissed pursuant to sovereign immunity. The Court is particularly concerned that USAA General Indemnity may be unable to obtain complete relief in this interpleader without the presence of USA Medical Center as a defendant.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that USA Medical Center is required to file an additional brief concerning its [6] Motion on or before May 7, 2018.

IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that any party that opposes USA Medical Center's [6] Motion must file a brief on or before May 22, 2018.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 23rd day of April, 2018.

/s/_________

LOUIS GUIROLA, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

USAA Gen. Indem. Co. v. Lytle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 23, 2018
CAUSE NO. 1:17CV361-LG-RHW (S.D. Miss. Apr. 23, 2018)
Case details for

USAA Gen. Indem. Co. v. Lytle

Case Details

Full title:USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY PLAINTIFF v. JONATHAN LYTLE; USA MEDICAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 23, 2018

Citations

CAUSE NO. 1:17CV361-LG-RHW (S.D. Miss. Apr. 23, 2018)