From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Oates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
May 23, 2013
5:12-cr-283-KOB-TMP (N.D. Ala. May. 23, 2013)

Summary

applying the factors identified in Nken in determining whether to grant a stay under Rule 38(e)

Summary of this case from United States v. Yalincak

Opinion

5:12-cr-283-KOB-TMP

05-23-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DIANE CUTTS OATES, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 5, 2013, the Clerk issued notice to the defendant of the issuance of the writ of execution and advised her of her right to request a hearing regarding any exemptions to the execution claimed by the defendant. (Doc. 36). The defendant filed her request for a hearing on March 13, 2013, claiming exemptions under paragraphs 6 and 9 of the notice. (Doc. 43). On March 20, 2013, the magistrate judge entered his report and recommendation (doc. 49), recommending that the court deny the motion to stay the writ of execution pending appeal and that the court deny the defendant's claims of exemption. The defendant filed no objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

After careful consideration of the entire record in this case, including the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge that the court deny the request to stay the writ of execution and that the court deny the defendant's claims of exemption. The court finds that the defendant has failed to show any entitlement to any exemptions of the funds in the IBM 401(k) Plus Plan owned by her and that such funds are subject to the writ of execution for collection of the restitution ordered in this case. Moreover, the court finds that the defendant should not receive credit toward her restitution amount for money deducted by the Social Security Administration to pay the defendant's child-support arrearage.

The court further finds that the defendant's motion for stay of execution of the restitution order pending appeal is due to be denied because she failed to make a "strong showing" of a likelihood of success on the merits.

The court will enter a separate Order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion.

______________________

KARON OWEN BOWDRE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Oates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
May 23, 2013
5:12-cr-283-KOB-TMP (N.D. Ala. May. 23, 2013)

applying the factors identified in Nken in determining whether to grant a stay under Rule 38(e)

Summary of this case from United States v. Yalincak
Case details for

United States v. Oates

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DIANE CUTTS OATES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 23, 2013

Citations

5:12-cr-283-KOB-TMP (N.D. Ala. May. 23, 2013)

Citing Cases

United States v. Yalincak

The Supreme Court identified four factors traditionally relevant to a court's decision regarding whether to…