From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mashunkashey

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nov 10, 1934
73 F.2d 487 (10th Cir. 1934)

Opinion

Nos. 1030 and 1031.

November 10, 1934.

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Oklahoma; Franklin E. Kennamer, Judge.

On petition for rehearing.

Petition denied.

For former opinion, see 72 F.2d 847.

Pedro Capo-Rodriguez, of Washington, D.C., and Joe W. Howard, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Tulsa, Okla. (Harry W. Blair, Asst. Atty. Gen., C.E. Bailey, U.S. Atty., of Tulsa, Okla., and Clifford E. Fix, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for the United States.

C.B. Stuart, of Tulsa, Okla. (M.L. Holcombe and Clarence Lohman, both of Pawhuska, Okla., and E.J. Doerner, W.E. Hudson, and R.D. Hudson, all of Tulsa, Okla., on the brief), for Rosa Mashunkashey and others.

Before PHILLIPS, McDERMOTT, and BRATTON, Circuit Judges.



In a petition for rehearing filed herein by Rosa Mashunkashey, the statement is made that Charles Mashunkashey died pending the appeal, and all the property involved herein has descended to persons under no governmental restrictions. We are asked to modify our order on that account. This we cannot do. This court is not the forum to explore in the first instance the facts of death and descent, nor the law applicable thereto. If facts have arisen pending the appeal which justify any alteration or modification of the orders appealed from, such matters should be formally presented to the trial court, opportunity given to answer them, and the issues there determined.

The petition for rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

United States v. Mashunkashey

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nov 10, 1934
73 F.2d 487 (10th Cir. 1934)
Case details for

United States v. Mashunkashey

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. MASHUNKASHEY et al. MASHUNKASHEY v. UNITED STATES

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Nov 10, 1934

Citations

73 F.2d 487 (10th Cir. 1934)