From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Martinez-Beltran

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Mar 13, 2019
No. CR 18-1200-TUC-JAS (LCK) (D. Ariz. Mar. 13, 2019)

Opinion

No. CR 18-1200-TUC-JAS (LCK)

03-13-2019

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Arturo Esteban Martinez-Beltran, Defendant.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) issued by United States Magistrate Judge Kimmins. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Kimmins' recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Kimmins' Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) is accepted and adopted. (2) The motion to suppress (Doc. 20) is granted as discussed in Magistrate Judge Kimmins' Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38); all evidence obtained from the traffic stop, search, and interrogation is precluded.

DATED this 13th day of March, 2019.

/s/_________

James A. Soto

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Martinez-Beltran

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Mar 13, 2019
No. CR 18-1200-TUC-JAS (LCK) (D. Ariz. Mar. 13, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Martinez-Beltran

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Arturo Esteban Martinez-Beltran…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Mar 13, 2019

Citations

No. CR 18-1200-TUC-JAS (LCK) (D. Ariz. Mar. 13, 2019)