Summary
affirming district court by evenly divided court
Summary of this case from Heward v. Bd. of Educ.Opinion
No. 19-4137
05-20-2021
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. Allen H. LOUGHRY, II, Defendant – Appellant.
ARGUED: Elbert Lin, HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Richard Gregory McVey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Nicholas D. Stellakis, Boston, Massachusetts, Katy Boatman, HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP, Houston, Texas, for Appellant. Michael B. Stuart, United States Attorney, Philip H. Wright, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
ARGUED: Elbert Lin, HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Richard Gregory McVey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Nicholas D. Stellakis, Boston, Massachusetts, Katy Boatman, HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP, Houston, Texas, for Appellant. Michael B. Stuart, United States Attorney, Philip H. Wright, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, MOTZ, AGEE, KEENAN, WYNN, DIAZ, FLOYD, HARRIS, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Judge King, Judge Thacker, and Judge Rushing took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
--------
Affirmed by published per curiam opinion.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court is affirmed by an equally divided court.
AFFIRMED