Summary
denying Rule 36 motion to correct drug quantity in PSR when court made the drug quantity findings itself and noting that what petitioner actually sought was to amend the amount of drugs found by the court at sentencing
Summary of this case from United States v. TaylorOpinion
No. 15-7787
04-21-2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RODERICK BLACK, a/k/a Roger, Defendant - Appellant.
Roderick Black, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (2:94-cr-00015-BO-9) Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roderick Black, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Roderick Black appeals the district court's order denying relief on his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a clerical error in his presentence investigation report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Black, No. 2:94-cr-00015-BO-9 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED