holding plaintiffs claim nonjusticiable because it related to military promotion
Summary of this case from Middlebrooks v. ThompsonNos. 95-376, 95-593.
March 25, 1996.
ORDER
C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 57 F. 3d 1255.
holding plaintiffs claim nonjusticiable because it related to military promotion
Summary of this case from Middlebrooks v. Thompsonholding plaintiff's claim non-justiciable because it related to military promotion
Summary of this case from Middlebrooks v. Thompsonholding that "appropriate equitable relief" may include an injunction, specific performance, or restitutionary reimbursement
Summary of this case from Walker v. Rosestating that employee suing fiduciary under § 1132(B) may obtain equitable relief in the form of specific performance of fiduciary's assurances of benefit eligibility
Summary of this case from Blue Cross Blue Shield, Alabama v. Sandersincluding "interest" within definition of "gross income"
Summary of this case from Delaney v. C.I.RFull title:UNISYS CORP. v. PICKERING ET AL.; and PICKERING ET AL. v. UNISYS CORP
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 25, 1996
Section 502(a)(3) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3), permits a plan participant or beneficiary to bring a…
City of Bangor v. Citizens Communications CompanyNothing in the cases cited by the City suggests that it is immune from liability for such sewer activities.…