From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp.

U.S.
Oct 3, 1988
488 U.S. 825 (1988)

Summary

holding that "one who republishes a defamatory statement `adopts' it as his own, and is liable in equal measure to the original defamer."

Summary of this case from Woodruff v. Trepel

Opinion

No. 87-2046.

October 3, 1988.


C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 837 F. 2d 1044.


Summaries of

Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp.

U.S.
Oct 3, 1988
488 U.S. 825 (1988)

holding that "one who republishes a defamatory statement `adopts' it as his own, and is liable in equal measure to the original defamer."

Summary of this case from Woodruff v. Trepel

reversing district court's granting of a preliminary injunction against the revocation of a security clearance

Summary of this case from Williams v. Reilly

using the Elliott factors in a federal action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, then applying state collateral estoppel law

Summary of this case from Atiya v. Salt Lake County

opining that even a sole shareholder does not have standing to assert claims alleging wrongs to a corporation

Summary of this case from Kiefer v. Kiefer
Case details for

Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp.

Case Details

Full title:UNIROYAL, INC., ET AL. v. RUDKIN-WILEY CORP

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 3, 1988

Citations

488 U.S. 825 (1988)

Citing Cases

Henkel Corp. v. Coral, Inc.

The court also erroneously analyzed and weighed secondary considerations of non-obviousness.Uniroyal, Inc. v.…

Site Microsurgical Systems v. Surgin Surgical

The question of literal infringement is, however, a question of fact. See Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley…