From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

UMB Bank & Trust Co. v. S.H.M. West Parking Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1992
181 A.D.2d 577 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 24, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.).


Since three of the four consolidated mortgages were recorded before the month-to-month occupancy agreement between appellant and the other defendants, those three mortgages are superior in lien to the occupancy agreement (Dominion Fin. Corp. v 275 Washington St. Corp., 64 Misc.2d 1044, 1046) making the foreclosure effective to terminate appellant's leasehold rights (United States v Bedford Assocs., 491 F. Supp. 851, 866, affd in part and revd in part on other grounds 657 F.2d 1300, cert denied 456 U.S. 914). Plaintiff's exercise of its right under the consolidation agreement to take an assignment of future rents did not create a landlord-tenant relationship between it and appellant (see, Poughkeepsie Sav. Bank v Sloane Mfg. Co., 84 A.D.2d 212, 215).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

UMB Bank & Trust Co. v. S.H.M. West Parking Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1992
181 A.D.2d 577 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

UMB Bank & Trust Co. v. S.H.M. West Parking Corp.

Case Details

Full title:UMB BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Respondent, v. S.H.M. WEST PARKING CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 577 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
581 N.Y.S.2d 324

Citing Cases

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANK v. AMADEUS B, LLC

As plaintiff indicates, whether Ro is entitled to remain as a tenant under the federal statute is not a…