From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Two Clinton Square Corp. v. Friedler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 31, 1983
91 A.D.2d 1195 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

January 31, 1983

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Murphy, J.

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly vacated the notice to admit. A notice to admit may only be used to establish matters of fact. It is not intended to cover ultimate conclusions but only to eliminate as issues in litigation matters about which there should be no dispute at trial ( Spawton v. Strates Shows, 75 Misc.2d 813; Nader v General Motors Corp., 53 Misc.2d 515, affd 29 A.D.2d 632). We find paragraphs 89 through 119, which concern ultimate conclusions of fact and law, to be inappropriate. Plaintiff may submit a new notice to admit containing demands which are within the scope and intendment of CPLR 3123.


Summaries of

Two Clinton Square Corp. v. Friedler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 31, 1983
91 A.D.2d 1195 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Two Clinton Square Corp. v. Friedler

Case Details

Full title:TWO CLINTON SQUARE CORP., Appellant, v. SYDNEY FRIEDLER et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 31, 1983

Citations

91 A.D.2d 1195 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)