From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Twism Ents., L.L.C. v. State Bd. of Registration for Prof'l Eng'rs & Surveyors

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Feb 15, 2022
165 Ohio St. 3d 1540 (Ohio 2022)

Summary

In TWISM Ents., L.L.C., v. State Bd. of Registration for Professional Engineers & Surveyors, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-4677, the Supreme Court first discussed and ultimately rejected the oft-cited proposition of law that courts must "defer to an administrative agency's reasonable interpretation of a statute, or its reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute."

Summary of this case from Gerritsen v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio

Opinion

2021-1440

02-15-2022

TWISM ENTS., L.L.C. v. STATE BD. OF REGISTRATION FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS


CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

Appeal accepted on proposition of law Nos. I and II.

Kennedy, DeWine, and Brunner, JJ., would accept the appeal on all propositions of law.

O'Connor, C.J., and Stewart, J., dissent.


Summaries of

Twism Ents., L.L.C. v. State Bd. of Registration for Prof'l Eng'rs & Surveyors

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Feb 15, 2022
165 Ohio St. 3d 1540 (Ohio 2022)

In TWISM Ents., L.L.C., v. State Bd. of Registration for Professional Engineers & Surveyors, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-4677, the Supreme Court first discussed and ultimately rejected the oft-cited proposition of law that courts must "defer to an administrative agency's reasonable interpretation of a statute, or its reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute."

Summary of this case from Gerritsen v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio
Case details for

Twism Ents., L.L.C. v. State Bd. of Registration for Prof'l Eng'rs & Surveyors

Case Details

Full title:TWISM ENTS., L.L.C. v. STATE BD. OF REGISTRATION FOR PROFESSIONAL…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Feb 15, 2022

Citations

165 Ohio St. 3d 1540 (Ohio 2022)
180 N.E.3d 1170

Citing Cases

The State ex rel. Cassens Corp. v. Indus. Comm'n of Ohio

Additionally, we need not decide the extent to which we should defer to the commission's interpretation of a…

State ex rel. Pin Cha Byk v. Indus. Comm'n of Ohio

{¶ 27} We are not, however, required to defer to an administrative agency's interpretation of a statute…