From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 28, 1999
731 So. 2d 809 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding that trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence must comport with written sentencing order

Summary of this case from Willis v. State
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 97-1853

Opinion filed April 28, 1999. JANUARY TERM, 1999

An Appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Jerald Bagley, Judge — L.T. No. 94-33813.

Fred Turner, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, LEVY, and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is remanded to the trial court to conform the written sentencing orders to the trial court's oral pronouncements. See Tannehill v. State, 712 So.2d 438 (Fla.3d DCA 1998). Specifically, any reference that the sentences are coterminous must be removed from the written sentencing orders.

Remanded.

Summaries of

Turner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 28, 1999
731 So. 2d 809 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

holding that trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence must comport with written sentencing order

Summary of this case from Willis v. State
Case details for

Turner v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRED TURNER, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 28, 1999

Citations

731 So. 2d 809 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Willis v. State

We affirm the convictions, but remand for clarification of the sentence imposed. The trial court's oral…

Edie v. State

Upon the State's proper confession of error, we reverse the defendant's sentence and remand for entry of a…

2 Citing Cases