From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Reynolds Metals Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 15, 1986
721 S.W.2d 626 (Ark. 1986)

Summary

In Turner v. Reynolds Metal, Co., 290 Ark. 481, 721 S.W.2d 626 (1986), we considered whether a gas lease should be canceled due to "failure to produce in paying quantities."

Summary of this case from Ross Explorations, Inc. v. Freedom Energy

Opinion

No. 86-110

Opinion delivered December 15, 1986

1. MINES MINERALS — OIL GAS LEASE — LEASE REQUIRING PRODUCTION MEANS PRODUCTION IN PAYING QUANTITIES. — A provision in a habendum clause of an oil and gas lease requiring production means production in paying quantities, which generally means production which is profitable to the lessee. 2. MINES MINERALS — OIL GAS LEASE — FAILURE OF LESSEE TO PRODUCE OIL OR GAS IN PAYING QUANTITIES — LEASE MAY BE CANCELLED — LESSOR'S RECEIPT OF GAS FOR HOME IMMATERIAL. — Where an oil and gas lease was extended for a period of at least five years from date, and beyond said five year period for as long as oil and/or gas is produced from the leased lands or lands unitized therewith, the lease may be cancelled if oil or natural gas is not produced in paying quantities after the five year extension, and the fact that the lessor received free gas for her home is immaterial.

Appeal from Sebastian Chancery Court, Greenwood District; Bernice Kizer, Chancellor; reversed.

Martin, Vater Karr, by: Charles Karr, for appellant.

Warner Smith, by: P. K. Holmes, III, for appellee.


The only issue in this case is whether an oil and gas lease should be cancelled because of the failure to produce in paying quantities. The case was submitted upon a stipulation of the facts and the chancellor denied cancellation. We find the lease should have been cancelled.

Jean Turner owns 103 acres of land in Sebastian County. An oil and gas lease was entered into with Ryan Glover in 1951 for a primary term of ten years and thereafter as long as oil, gas or other minerals were produced from the land. Turner was to receive a royalty of 1/2 of the sales and free gas for her home. Glover later sold this lease to Reynolds Mining Corporation, the predecessor of Reynolds Metals Company.

On December 29, 1956, Reynolds Metals Company began drilling a gas well which was completed on May 6, 1957. This well, called J.T. Nichols #1, was one of ten wells operated by Reynolds Metals Company in the area known as Gragg Field. Production from these wells was sold to Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company pursuant to a 20 year purchase contract entered into on December 13, 1963. The first production from this well was sold in June, 1964.

On July 8, 1975, the parties entered into an agreement to extend the lease for a secondary term. The habendum clause of this supplemental agreement provided:

. . . [T]he undersigned, Jean Turner, . . . do hereby stipulate and agree with Reynolds Mining Corporation that the above-described lease is in full force and effect and shall remain in full force and effect for a period of at least five years from this date and beyond said five year period for as long as oil and/or gas is produced from the leased lands or lands unitized therewith. Without limiting the foregoing agreement the undersigned understand and agree that said lease shall remain in full force and effect regardless of the amount of gas that may be produced from the existing well in 25, and shall remain in full force and effect even if no oil or gas is produced during said five year period, from said well or from any other well within said 25; and for the purpose of determining the term of said lease said well shall be deemed to be producing gas in sufficient quantities to maintain said lease in full force and effect during said five year period.

Reynolds paid Turner $1,038 for the supplemental agreement. It was stipulated that the revenue produced from the well from 1975 through part of 1982 was as follows:

Year Revenues 1975 $613.65 1976 $785.39 1977 $704.10 1978 $744.57 1979 $913.24 1980 $801.45 1981 $585.40 1982 (first half) $333.39

It was also stipulated that Turner received royalties in the following amounts:

Year Royalty 1973 $ 1.62 1974 $11.31 1975 $16.24 1976 $14.49 1977 $18.48 1978 $19.58 1979 $23.61 1980 $20.52 1981 $10.98 1982

[1, 2] Turner's argument is that the well has not produced natural gas in paying quantities and, therefore, the lease is automatically terminated at the end of the secondary period, and she is right. A provision in a habendum clause of an oil and gas lease requiring production, as in this lease, means production in paying quantities. 2 Kuntz, Oil and Gas 26.7 (1964); 2 Summers, The Law of Oil and Gas 306 (1927); See McLeon v. Wells, 207 Ark. 303, 180 S.W.2d 325 (1944). Generally, production in paying quantities means production which is profitable to the lessee. 2 Summers, supra, at 307; 3 Williams, Oil and Gas Law 604.6 (a) (1985). Therefore, if natural gas was not produced in paying quantities after the five year extension, the lease may be cancelled. 2 Summers, supra, at 306; McLeon v. Wells, supra.

This well was not producing in paying quantities. Reynolds pays a contract pumper $1,100 per month for his services on the ten wells, which includes field operation of the wells and maintenance. If Reynolds' expenses were prorated so that 1/10th are assigned to this well, Reynolds lost money every year of the secondary term on this well, and thereafter until suit was filed.

The well never produced much revenue. Reynolds did nothing during that five year period to increase production. It was not until February 20, 1981, that Reynolds took any action when it wrote a letter to Arkansas Louisiana Gas to negotiate a new contract. The supplemental agreement recognized that the production was very poor and extended the lease for five years regardless of production. Once that term expired, the lessee had to produce in paying quantities, which it failed to do.

Reynolds later negotiated a higher purchase price for the gas in February, 1985 and in 1982 drilled a second well which will produce when connected to a pipeline. However, these efforts are irrelevant because they were made after Turner was entitled to cancel the lease. Also immaterial is the fact that Turner received free gas for her home.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Turner v. Reynolds Metals Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 15, 1986
721 S.W.2d 626 (Ark. 1986)

In Turner v. Reynolds Metal, Co., 290 Ark. 481, 721 S.W.2d 626 (1986), we considered whether a gas lease should be canceled due to "failure to produce in paying quantities."

Summary of this case from Ross Explorations, Inc. v. Freedom Energy
Case details for

Turner v. Reynolds Metals Co.

Case Details

Full title:Jean TURNER v. REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 15, 1986

Citations

721 S.W.2d 626 (Ark. 1986)
721 S.W.2d 626

Citing Cases

Ross Explorations, Inc. v. Freedom Energy

Ross asserts the trial court erred in adding in costs that were not lifting costs, although they might be…

Perry v. Nicor Exploration

Appellants first contend that the chancellor erred in considering the unit as a whole in determining whether…