Summary
holding that 18 U.S.C. § 3237 governs venue in mail fraud cases
Summary of this case from U.S. v. WoodOpinion
No. 89-1825.
April 2, 1990.
Appeal from E.D.Mich., 716 F.Supp. 1024.
AFFIRMED.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
TRAFFIC JAM SNUG v. MICHIGAN LIQUOR CTRL
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 2, 1990
899 F.2d 15 (6th Cir. 1990)
Summaries of
TRAFFIC JAM SNUG v. MICHIGAN LIQUOR CTRL
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 2, 1990
899 F.2d 15 (6th Cir. 1990)
holding that 18 U.S.C. § 3237 governs venue in mail fraud cases
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Woodfinding proof of venue in a mail fraud case based on a reasonable inference from circumstantial evidence, even though the sender did not testify about the packages at issue
Summary of this case from United States v. Petlechkovconcluding that "there was much more than mere propinquity" where officers had reason to believe that a suspected drug trafficker was using other parties to carry drugs and that the suspected drug trafficker had travelled to a city to conduct a drug transaction there, and where officers observed the defendant and the suspected drug trafficker check in at a hotel together and go to the same hotel room
Summary of this case from United States v. MartinCase details for
TRAFFIC JAM SNUG v. MICHIGAN LIQUOR CTRL
Case Details
Full title:Traffic Jam Snug, Inc. v. Michigan Liquor Control Com'n
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: Apr 2, 1990
Citations
899 F.2d 15 (6th Cir. 1990)
Citing Cases
U.S. v. Wood
For venue purposes, this court has held that mail fraud is a continuing offense governed by 18 U.S.C. §…
State v. ParsonsJudge Sheward indicated that had he interpreted the information as suggested by appellant's counsel, he would…