Summary
reiterating that written order must conform to court's oral pronouncement
Summary of this case from Shinn v. StateOpinion
Case No. 5D18-1932
03-22-2019
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the revocation of Appellant's community control, but remand with directions that the trial court enter a written order that conforms to its oral pronouncement finding violations of conditions five and nine. See Smith v. State, 49 So.3d 833, 834 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) ("A written order must conform to the trial court's oral pronouncements, and the oral pronouncements control." (citing Williams v. State, 604 So.2d 8, 9 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) ) ).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with Instructions.
BERGER, WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.