From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tompkins v. Hale

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 13, 1940
30 N.E.2d 721 (N.Y. 1940)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Tompkins v. Hale (supra) the stockholders of a "cooperative apartment house" had agreed in writing that such leases could be canceled and surrendered only if all the stockholder-tenants concurred.

Summary of this case from Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Argued October 11, 1940

Decided November 13, 1940

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, HAMMER, J.

Richard S. Holmes for appellants.

Leslie J. Tompkins for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, SEARS, LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ. Taking no part: LEHMAN, Ch. J.

Summaries of

Tompkins v. Hale

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 13, 1940
30 N.E.2d 721 (N.Y. 1940)

In Tompkins v. Hale (supra) the stockholders of a "cooperative apartment house" had agreed in writing that such leases could be canceled and surrendered only if all the stockholder-tenants concurred.

Summary of this case from Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel
Case details for

Tompkins v. Hale

Case Details

Full title:JEAN B. TOMPKINS, Respondent, v. HUGH E. HALE et al., as Directors of 1165…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 13, 1940

Citations

30 N.E.2d 721 (N.Y. 1940)
30 N.E.2d 721

Citing Cases

Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel

That whole concept is destroyed when the stockholders, by agreement, by-law or certificate of incorporation…

Vernon Manor Apts. v. Salatino

ler, 304 N.Y. 105, 108). No vested right may be built on a permission granted, just as no vested right is…

8 Citing Cases