From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tomberlin v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jan 16, 2009
CIVIL ACTION No. 07-2592-KHV (D. Kan. Jan. 16, 2009)

Summary

remanding where "ALJ summarized the evidence upon which he based his RFC assessment and stated his conclusion regarding mental RFC," but "failed to cite specific medical facts to describe how the evidence supports each mental RFC conclusion"

Summary of this case from Armijo v. Berryhill

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 07-2592-KHV.

January 16, 2009


ORDER


Julie Tomberlin appeals the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny supplemental security income. On December 16, 2008, Magistrate Judge Donald W. Bostwick recommended that the Commissioner's decision be reversed and that this case be remanded pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. See Report And Recommendation (Doc. #16). The deadline for written objections to Judge Bostwick's Report and Recommendation was December 31, 2008. The parties have not objected. For this reason, and for good cause shown, the Court adopts the Report And Recommendation (Doc. #16) in its entirety.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision be and hereby is REVERSED. This case is REMANDED pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report And Recommendation (Doc. #16).


Summaries of

Tomberlin v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jan 16, 2009
CIVIL ACTION No. 07-2592-KHV (D. Kan. Jan. 16, 2009)

remanding where "ALJ summarized the evidence upon which he based his RFC assessment and stated his conclusion regarding mental RFC," but "failed to cite specific medical facts to describe how the evidence supports each mental RFC conclusion"

Summary of this case from Armijo v. Berryhill
Case details for

Tomberlin v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JULIE TOMBERLIN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Jan 16, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 07-2592-KHV (D. Kan. Jan. 16, 2009)

Citing Cases

Perryman v. Astrue

The "ALJ should not state a mental RFC in terms of the four broad mental functional areas, but must make a…

Armijo v. Berryhill

The Court is left to guess at how the ALJ arrived at the mental limitations in Ms. Armijo's RFC. This is…